TextGPT

İlk izlenimim karışıktı, sonra oturdu. Artık haftalık araç setimin parçası.

I have been using TextGPT for a few weeks on real client work, not just demos. The first week was mostly learning prompts and figuring out which templates stick. After that, drafting time dropped noticeably — especially for outlines, email replies, and first-pass summaries. It is not flawless: long documents sometimes lose structure, and I still fact-check anything important. Still, for a busy week it has become one of the tools I open without thinking. If you already have a clear workflow, TextGPT fits in cleanly. If you expect magic with zero editing, you will be disappointed. For me, the time saved on the boring middle steps is worth it.

I compared a few alternatives and this one felt more practical for everyday use.

Detailed take after daily use: TextGPT is strongest on speed and decent on quality when the brief is clear. I tested it against two alternatives on the same tasks (blog outline, meeting notes cleanup, and a short product FAQ). TextGPT was the fastest and produced the least awkward tone. Weak points are edge cases — niche jargon and multi-step instructions sometimes drift. I solved that with a saved prompt style guide. Pricing is okay if you actually use it several times a week; otherwise the free tier may be enough. Overall I would recommend it to freelancers and small teams who need reliable first drafts, not final publish-ready copy every time.

Arayüzü temiz, çıktı kalitesi iyi. Günlük işlerimde sık kullanıyorum.