open-assistant

Translation · Free to use · 8 reviews

Free
open-assistant - Translation logo
3.63
Based on 8 Reviews

5

25.00%

4

37.50%

3

12.50%

2

25.00%

1

0.00%
Quick Facts
  • Category: Translation
  • Pricing: Free
  • Listed: 29 Aug 2023
  • Updated: 19 Sep 2026
  • Rating: 3.63/5 (8 reviews)
  • Website: open-assistant.io
Tags
conversation , enhancing , revolutionary
About open-assistant

You will be amazed by the possibilities Open Assistant provides. With conversational AI technology that is free to use and modify, this project is set to revolutionize the way we communicate with machines. Open source license and released training data under CC BY 4.0 allows the knowledge and technology gifted to the world for the benefit of humanity. The project is still in early development, but they are already making strides with established research in applying RLHF to large language models. Join their Discord channel or Github Team to stay up-to-date with the project development, and help improve the technology. Open Assistant is a promising start towards democratizing the advanced AI technology.

Based on 8 verified user reviews — Average rating: 3.63/5

Editorial & Trust Information
Published by Ai Directory Platform
Last Updated
Category Translation

Our team independently researches AI tools, verifies official sources, and publishes user reviews. Ratings reflect real user feedback. We may earn affiliate commissions — this does not affect our editorial ratings.

@alanreyes3570 profile photo
@alanreyes3570
Turkey

What surprised me about open-assistant is how little friction there is once you set preferences. I keep a short checklist: audience, tone, must-include points, and forbidden phrases. With that, outputs are consistently usable. Without it, results feel generic. I also like that I can iterate quickly instead of restarting from a blank page. Missing features for me: better version history and clearer export options. Even so, it has replaced a couple of scattered tools in my stack. Rating reflects practical value in my week, not hype from the landing page.

@amygray1031 profile photo
@amygray1031
Turkey

Reliable enough for production drafts. I edit the output, but the first pass is strong.

@zoeyyyyy profile photo
@zoeyyyyy
Turkey

What surprised me about open-assistant is how little friction there is once you set preferences. I keep a short checklist: audience, tone, must-include points, and forbidden phrases. With that, outputs are consistently usable. Without it, results feel generic. I also like that I can iterate quickly instead of restarting from a blank page. Missing features for me: better version history and clearer export options. Even so, it has replaced a couple of scattered tools in my stack. Rating reflects practical value in my week, not hype from the landing page.

Advertisement
Advertisement
@petergray4805 profile photo
@petergray4805
Turkey

Ciddi iyileştirme lazım. Yavaş, tutarsız ve destek yardımcı olmadı.

@olivialewis6568 profile photo
@olivialewis6568
Turkey

I have been using open-assistant for a few weeks on real client work, not just demos. The first week was mostly learning prompts and figuring out which templates stick. After that, drafting time dropped noticeably — especially for outlines, email replies, and first-pass summaries. It is not flawless: long documents sometimes lose structure, and I still fact-check anything important. Still, for a busy week it has become one of the tools I open without thinking. If you already have a clear workflow, open-assistant fits in cleanly. If you expect magic with zero editing, you will be disappointed. For me, the time saved on the boring middle steps is worth it.

We use cookies for site functionality, preferences, analytics, and advertising (including Google AdSense). You can manage cookies in your browser settings. Learn more about our cookie policy